FHFinanceHub Academy
Home › CFA® Level III › Portfolio Construction
CFA® Level III · Portfolio Construction · free lesson

Case Study in Portfolio Management: Institutional (SWF)

This case applies portfolio management to a sovereign wealth fund built from natural resource revenue, an investor whose biggest risks often sit outside its portfolio. The module shows how to identify financial, environmental and social risks against the whole national balance sheet, analyse combined exposures with carbon metrics, stress tests and scenarios, manage the risks of long-term direct investments, and evaluate and strengthen an enterprise risk management framework.

What you will learn

1. Identify the financial, environmental and social risks in a sovereign wealth fund's portfolio strategy, judged against the sponsor's whole national balance sheet.

  • Assess SWF risk on the national balance sheet: the fund plus resource wealth and the budget that depends on it.
  • Financial risks: market, concentration, currency, liquidity, credit and inflation; the key one is correlation with the sponsor's revenue.
  • Environmental risks: transition (stranded assets, carbon prices) and physical (storms, floods, heat).
  • Social and governance risks: labour and human rights, reputational and political backlash, interference and transparency.
  • Resource-based funds often underweight their own sector to diversify national wealth.

2. Analyze a sovereign fund's combined financial and non-financial risk exposures using carbon metrics, carbon-price stress tests and scenario analysis.

  • Financial and non-financial risks share drivers (commodity prices, carbon policy, geopolitics) and must be analysed together.
  • Non-financial risks reach value through cash flows, discount rates, asset lives and liquidity.
  • WACI = sum of portfolio weight x (emissions / revenue).
  • EBITDA at risk from carbon pricing = emissions x carbon price x (1 - pass-through) / EBITDA.
  • Scenario analysis should cover the whole national balance sheet, including sponsor revenue and withdrawals.

3. Recommend methods for managing the risks of a sovereign fund's long-term direct investments in infrastructure, real estate and private companies.

  • Use full due diligence, including ESG, regulatory and political risks, and stress-test the business plan.
  • Co-invest with experienced operators and secure governance, information and exit rights.
  • Prefer contractual and regulatory protections and limit leverage, which magnifies shocks to equity.
  • Diversify by sector, country, regulator, currency and vintage; cap single-asset exposure; stage commitments.
  • Monitor actively, value independently, plan refinancing and exits, and manage reputational risk.

4. Evaluate a sovereign fund's enterprise risk management framework and propose specific improvements.

  • ERM covers all risks together and ties them to a board-approved, quantified risk appetite.
  • An independent chief risk officer and the three lines model separate risk taking, oversight and assurance.
  • Measure with volatility, expected shortfall, stressed liquidity and combined scenarios; use unsmoothed private-asset risk.
  • Limits must link to the risk appetite with clear escalation; reporting should meet Santiago Principles transparency.
  • Typical fixes: quantify appetite, make the CRO independent, run combined stress tests, integrate ESG, learn from failures.

Module at a glance

This free module has 4 lessons, 16 practice questions with full explanations and 1 essay case with a model answer.